Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Qt availability changes
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:09:19 -0800
On Jan 27, 2020, at 12:53 PM, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:
Finally, I would not call it a day yet. Qt has become a very strategic project for a lot of people. I could imagine, that the outcry over this decision will be as big as the one 2015 over the first attempt to close down the installer. I could imagine, that they will backpedal the ideas a little bit in the near future, although I will not betting on it.
At least it hasn't yet produced an effort to clone Qt, unlike earlier licensing issues: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmony_(toolkit) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Qt availability changes Gerald Combs (Jan 27)
- Re: Qt availability changes Graham Bloice (Jan 27)
- Re: Qt availability changes Roland Knall (Jan 27)
- Re: Qt availability changes Guy Harris (Jan 27)
- Re: Qt availability changes Peter Wu (Jan 27)
- Re: Qt availability changes Graham Bloice (Jan 28)
- Re: Qt availability changes Guy Harris (Jan 28)
- Re: Qt availability changes Roland Knall (Jan 28)
- Re: Qt availability changes Roland Knall (Jan 28)
- Re: Qt availability changes João Valverde (Jan 30)
- Re: Qt availability changes Roland Knall (Jan 30)
- Re: Qt availability changes Roland Knall (Jan 27)
- Re: Qt availability changes Graham Bloice (Jan 27)