Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Standard defined field names in Wireshark dissectors
From: Tomasz Moń <desowin () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 17:06:17 +0100
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 4:54 PM Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:
However, I'm cautious about renaming fields "just because" as this will likely break any scripts\workflows folks have that rely on the current field names.
In case of the USB Audio descriptor dissection, I would like to change the header_field_info name, leaving abbrev as is. Would that still cause problems? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Standard defined field names in Wireshark dissectors Tomasz Moń (Jan 05)
- Re: Standard defined field names in Wireshark dissectors Graham Bloice (Jan 05)
- Re: Standard defined field names in Wireshark dissectors Tomasz Moń (Jan 05)
- Re: Standard defined field names in Wireshark dissectors Guy Harris (Jan 05)
- Re: Standard defined field names in Wireshark dissectors Dario Lombardo (Jan 05)
- Re: Standard defined field names in Wireshark dissectors Alexis La Goutte (Jan 05)
- Re: Standard defined field names in Wireshark dissectors Tomasz Moń (Jan 05)
- Re: Standard defined field names in Wireshark dissectors Graham Bloice (Jan 05)