Re: Bug in extcap?

[Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com>]

There is at least one bug open for that. Can you push a change on gerrit so
we can start the review/discussion?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2020, 22:54 Anders Esbensen <Anders.Esbensen () silabs com>
wrote:

> 
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m seeing some issues with extcap on linux and osx. If I run udpdump and
> stop it again the udp process is not terminated. If I start udpdump once
> again I will have two udpdump processes running on my system. I’ve tested
> this on v2.4.5 and v3.2.1.
>
>
>
> Looking though the code I cannot find any places in extcap.c where the
> dumper is terminated, but for Windows it seems that the dumper process is
> terminated in extcap.c:1142.
>
>
>
> I’ve attached a patch which seems to solve the issue, but I’m not quite
> sure it’s the right thing to do.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Anders
>
>
>
>
>
> *Anders Lynge Esbensen*
>
> Staff Software Engineer, IoT Software
>
>
>
> Emdrupvej 28B, 2100 København Ø, Denmark
>
>
>
> <http://www.silabs.com/>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe