Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Outreachy] Internship blog 2020
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:47:08 -0800
Hi Joey, Joey Salazar wrote:
Very happy to be joining for this winter's internship! A short blog entry on the beginning of this journey here: https://jsal.home.blog/ A new entry every 2 weeks, check it out! Thank you Outreachy, Git, and Wireshark for the opportunity, happy to be working together!
Welcome! I'm looking forward to working together (starting with an initial wireshark patch to get the lay of the land, then fleshing out the plan for the project, then executing on it in earnest). A question for wireshark developers: are there preferences for what a high quality dissector looks like? [1] talks about portability and robustness but doesn't address other aspects of convention such as how long functions should be (like [2] does). Is there a rule of thumb like "when in doubt, do things the way <such-and-such dissector> does?" Excited, Jonathan [1] https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/raw/master/doc/README.developer [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/coding-style.html ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- [Outreachy] Internship blog 2020 Joey Salazar via Wireshark-dev (Dec 03)
- Re: [Outreachy] Internship blog 2020 Jonathan Nieder (Dec 03)
- Re: [Outreachy] Internship blog 2020 ronnie sahlberg (Dec 03)
- Re: [Outreachy] Internship blog 2020 ronnie sahlberg (Dec 03)
- Re: [Outreachy] Internship blog 2020 ronnie sahlberg (Dec 03)
- Re: [Outreachy] Internship blog 2020 Jonathan Nieder (Dec 03)