Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: QtCustomPlot: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Wireshark
From: Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:09:16 +0200
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:24 AM Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:
Hi Jaap I was in contact with the original developer of QCustomPlot. According to his statement, this warning is a false-positive, as it cannot occur with real numbers.
Maybe I'm wrong but I read 20769 result[i*2+0].setX(valueAxis->coordToPixel(0)); and the issue is within coordToPixel() called with 0. As far as I recall, qcustomplot is "amalgamated" (QCustomPlot uses code amalgamation to generate the single .h/.cpp pair from its source tree). Maybe the error is in the amalgamation routine not the code itself. Just guessing.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- QtCustomPlot: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Wireshark Jaap Keuter (Sep 20)
- Re: QtCustomPlot: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Wireshark Roland Knall (Sep 24)
- Re: QtCustomPlot: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Wireshark Dario Lombardo (Sep 25)
- Re: QtCustomPlot: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Wireshark Roland Knall (Sep 24)