Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Migrate to GitLab?


From: Jano Svitok <jan.svitok () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 00:38:00 +0200

Few notes:

- instead of git push origin HEAD:feature-number-1 -f (--force) it's better
to use --force-with-lease that avoids forcing if the remote branch changed
in the meantime (e.g. it prevents losing someone else's commits)

- gitlab issues are OK, but bugzilla is much more elaborate (for example
allows custom fields and most of all, allows custom states -- gitlab flow
and issue states is fixed! custom states have to be simulated using tags).
I am not that familiar with wireshark bugzilla, but I suggest that someone
that is familiar goes through typical workflows, and checks that all needed
information can be stored in gitlab issues.

- I like that wiki is in Markdown or asciidoc format, so that it can be
quite easily published to html/pdf

- I don't know gerrit much, but I like gitlab/github's idea of merge
requests, in that you can review several related (atomic?) commits at once,
and squash them if needed afterwards. It may help separate individual
changes (to ease the review) while still keeping them in one bunch.

https://gitlab.com/wireshark/gitlab-migration/wikis/home seems to be in a
private repo.

You may want to check cmake's gitlab instance:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: