Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Represent byte array longer than MAX_BYTE_STR_LEN as hexstring


From: Jason Cohen <kryojenik2 () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 21:27:27 -0500

In the packet detail.

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 9:15 PM Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:

On Aug 3, 2019, at 4:39 PM, Jason Cohen <kryojenik2 () gmail com> wrote:

I've got a lengths of bytes that I need to read from the tvb and render
as a hex string that are / may be longer than MAX_BYTE_STR_LEN which is
defined as 48.  I do not need the actual bytes from the tvb after I render
it as a hexstring.

Render where?

In the summary line for the packet?  We currently impose a limit of 256
bytes on columns in the summary line, so the length of hex strings could be
increased, but there's still a limit.

In the packet detail entry for the field?  We currently impose a limit of
240 bytes on the text representation of entries in the protocol tree, so
the length of hex strings could be increased, but there's still a limit.

Somewhere else?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: