Wireshark mailing list archives
Does proto_deregister_field really work?
From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 16:51:13 -0700
Hi folks, I have an application where I want to change the specification of an HF entry or two, and found proto_deregister_field. It would seem that I can deregister a field and then register a new version of it ... as long as I am careful. What is the cost of doing this? Is an alternative to register a fixed array but modify the entries? -- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Does proto_deregister_field really work? Richard Sharpe (May 09)
- Re: Does proto_deregister_field really work? Peter Wu (May 27)
- Re: Does proto_deregister_field really work? Richard Sharpe (May 28)
- Re: Does proto_deregister_field really work? Paul Offord (May 28)
- Re: Does proto_deregister_field really work? Guy Harris (May 28)
- Re: Does proto_deregister_field really work? Richard Sharpe (May 28)
- Re: Does proto_deregister_field really work? Peter Wu (May 27)