Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Ways to make Wireshark tarball


From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 18:04:29 +0200



On 8 May 2018, at 17:06, Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:



On Tue, 8 May 2018 at 15:46, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl <mailto:jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>> wrote:


On 8 May 2018, at 14:20, Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com <mailto:graham.bloice () trihedral com>> 
wrote:



On Tue, 8 May 2018 at 13:11, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl <mailto:jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>> wrote:
Hi list,

In autotools times (i.e., 2.6.x) I was used to run:

$ make dist

to get a Wireshark source code tarball.
It looks like CMake wants to offer something similar

$ cmake ../ -DWS_SOURCE_DIR=“/tmp/wireshark”
$ make dist

But this fails over unreachable target ‘package_source’.
So, is this even supposed to work? 
It uses cmake/modules/Dist.cmake, a module gone from the master.
Do we now fall back to tools/git-export-release.sh?
What am I missing here?


Seems to be what the buildbot is doing: 
https://buildbot.wireshark.org/wireshark-master/builders/Ubuntu%2016.04%20x64/builds/5055/steps/git-export-release/logs/stdio
 
<https://buildbot.wireshark.org/wireshark-master/builders/Ubuntu%2016.04%20x64/builds/5055/steps/git-export-release/logs/stdio>
 
-- 
Graham Bloice



Indeed, for master. 

What about master-2.6? There the autotools tarball build is used on the buildbot.
How is it supposed to work there with CMake?

Thanks,
Jaap



That would seem to still be using autotools and "make dist": 
https://buildbot.wireshark.org/wireshark-2.6/builders/Ubuntu%2016.04%20x64/builds/101/steps/shell_2/logs/stdio 
<https://buildbot.wireshark.org/wireshark-2.6/builders/Ubuntu%2016.04%20x64/builds/101/steps/shell_2/logs/stdio>

-- 
Graham Bloice

For the official release tarballs, yes. 
But that is not the question. The question is how this is supposed to work with CMake in master-2.6?
Or is is not supposed to work at all, because then there’s rubbish in the repository suggesting it is.

Thanks,
Jaap


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: