Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking

[Michael Mann via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>]

I'd just reopen the existing bug.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Wiens <th.wiens () gmx de>
To: wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Sent: Mon, Jan 15, 2018 12:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Subtree expand/collapse tracking

On 13.01.2018 08:31, Roland Knall wrote:> Could you create a bug entry for this, including an example trace,> with 
which we could demonstrate this behavior ?There is still an issue with this. Should I reopen the bug or create anew 
one?The subtree is now opened correctly, but only if you have selected atree element under the root tree.For the sample 
capture within tcp tree:select #1, expand tcp, expand tcp.flagsselect #2, tcp is expanded down to tcp.flags as 
expectedselect the ip root nodeselect #1, tcp is closed-- 
CheersThomas___________________________________________________________________________Sent via:    Wireshark-dev 
mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-devUnsubscribe: 
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark 
org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe