Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Compiling with or without extcap
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 12:02:23 -0800
For what it's worth, libpcap 1.8 and later don't require that a local interface be openable before listing it in pcap_findalldevs(), so, whilst you might still need dumpcap to *capture* packets, it should be possible to *enumerate* interfaces directly within Wireshark/TShark with libpcap 1.8 and later, as you shouldn't need elevated privileges to enumerate interfaces. This might speed up the process. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap, (continued)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Roland Knall (Jan 04)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Anders Broman (Jan 04)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Dario Lombardo (Jan 06)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Stig Bjørlykke (Jan 06)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Dario Lombardo (Jan 07)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Roland Knall (Jan 07)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Guy Harris (Jan 07)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Anders Broman (Jan 09)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Roland Knall (Jan 09)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Anders Broman (Jan 09)
- Re: Compiling with or without extcap Guy Harris (Jan 09)