Wireshark mailing list archives
clarification on 802.11 dissector
From: francisco javier sanchez-roselly <franciscojavier.sanchezroselly () ujaen es>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:46:41 +0100
hi All, i am checking some 802.11 frames and i have two doubts taking into account 802.11-2016 standard. the first one has to do with To DS and From DS bits. the dissector groups these bits as a ‘DS status’ field not defined in the standard. the meaning is clear, but in my opinion, this association breaks the endianness criterion for the rest of the frame fields. my other suggestion refers to FCS field, as standard says the general convention is not followed for this field, and the highest order term is transmited first. please ask you to guide me if i am missing something. otherwise, i will be glad to contribute with any change in the code. thanks, regards. francisco javier sanchez-roselly ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- clarification on 802.11 dissector francisco javier sanchez-roselly (Dec 05)
- Re: clarification on 802.11 dissector Richard Sharpe (Dec 05)
- Re: clarification on 802.11 dissector francisco javier sanchez-roselly (Dec 05)
- Re: clarification on 802.11 dissector Richard Sharpe (Dec 05)
- Re: clarification on 802.11 dissector francisco javier sanchez-roselly (Dec 05)
- Re: clarification on 802.11 dissector Richard Sharpe (Dec 05)