Re: [Wireshark-commits] master d347091: Qt: Fix MacOSX menu entries

[Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>]

There is general support for dropping autotools on master (after fixing the
rpm build).

But I'll rewrite the patches for 2.4 and 2.6 to add a compile switch, so
that the patch only applies if it is build with cmake. Adding Objective-C
builds to auto tools seems pointless at this point, to me at least.

 regards
Roland

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:

> On Apr 9, 2018, at 8:44 AM, Wireshark code review <
> code-review-do-not-reply () wireshark org> wrote:
>
> > URL: https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;
> a=commit;h=d347091da962a3bb095c62339fc6faa07d189a9f
> > Submitter: Roland Knall (rknall () gmail com)
> > Changed: branch: master
> > Repository: wireshark
> >
> > Commits:
> >
> > d347091 by Roland Knall (rknall () gmail com):
> >
> >    Qt: Fix MacOSX menu entries
>
> This doesn't built with autotools.
>
> Autotools already has problems with Qt on macOS, and I think there was
> some talk about abandoning autotools support in 3.0; is it time to get rid
> of autotools support, at least in the master branch, in general, or even
> just on macOS (there's no Windows autotools support to get rid of)?
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=
> unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe