Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Best way to give configuration information to a protocol
From: Michael Mann via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:33:29 -0400
I would agree that a dissector table for the GUIDs is probably the best way to go. I also just created a GUID dissector table in my recent work with Netmon. grep "netmon.provider_id" for example of how to setup a GUID dissector table (it's much more straightforward than the DCE/RPC one) -----Original Message----- From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Sent: Mon, Sep 18, 2017 3:03 pm Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Best way to give configuration information to a protocol Hi Juan Jose, 2017-09-18 17:12 GMT+02:00 Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa <juanjo () rti com>: Hi all, Which is the best way to pass configuration to a protocol? Do we have any builtin mechanisms? I tried to upload a patch using CSV at some point but it didn't succeed. So I wonder if there is any recommended way I can implement: table or list in the Preferences, XML file, CSV file... My goal is to pass ("GUID", "plugin_name") pairs to the RTPS protocol so Wireshark knows dynamically what plugin it should call to deserialize data that is written by the DataWriter with id = "GUID". The GUID is part of the DATA packet and it is already dissected and known at that point. A UAT dialog could be appropriate for your needs. Several dissectors are already using it and can be taken as an example (packet-ipsec.c, packet-http.c, ...). Or if the GUID / plugin mapping never changes, you could create a dissector table and have your plugin register to this table (see register_dissector_table() / register_custom_dissector_table() and the corresponding dissector_add_XXX() functions). Best regards, Pascal. ___________________________________________________________________________Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-devUnsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Best way to give configuration information to a protocol Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa (Sep 18)
- Re: Best way to give configuration information to a protocol Pascal Quantin (Sep 18)
- Re: Best way to give configuration information to a protocol Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa (Sep 18)
- Re: Best way to give configuration information to a protocol Michael Mann via Wireshark-dev (Sep 18)
- Re: Best way to give configuration information to a protocol Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa (Sep 19)
- Re: Best way to give configuration information to a protocol Pascal Quantin (Sep 18)