Wireshark mailing list archives

Duplicate dissectors (anonymous) and (anonymous) for protocol xxx


From: John Dill <John.Dill () greenfieldeng com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 20:44:28 +0000

I just happened to turn on console printing to troubleshoot a different problem and I'm getting a couple of interesting 
messages when I change my protocol preferences.



Duplicate dissectors (anonymous) and (anonymous) for protocol xxx in dissector table tcp.port

Protocol <Protocol Description> is already registered in "udp" table.



I have a proto_reg_handoff_xxx that creates a couple of TCP port dissector handles using 
'dissector_add_uint("tcp.port", MY_TCP_PORT, tcp_handle)', and a UDP heuristic dissector 'heur_dissector_add("udp", 
dissect_xxx_udp_heur, "<Protocol Description>", "xxx", proto_xxx, HEURISTIC_ENABLE)'.



My question is whether I'm doing something not recommended.  The protocol uses both TCP and UDP packets to send data, 
and I've lumped it under one "xxx" protocol.  For the most part, it hasn't been an issue operationally, but I'm 
wondering if there's a better way to do it so I don't have these messages.  I haven't looked at the console output in 
detail before, so I've missed this up till now.



Is there any advice about dissecting a protocol that appears on both TCP and UDP streams and using the same name, or 
what I'm doing specifically that's causing it?  The messages have the same format, but the packaging in the TCP vs the 
UDP streams is slightly different.



Best regards,

John D.


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: