Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Troubles with ASN generated code


From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 23:10:17 +0100

On 21 May 2017 at 23:00, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:

On May 21, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>
wrote:

It would appear not in a static initializer list. I can do it piecemeal,
e.g. foo.member = &fff.

Does "piecemeal" really mean "in executable code"?


I think so, from the dlltest2.zip, dllimport.c:




If I try to assign &fff in an initialiser list I get an "error C2099:
initializer is not a constant".

If you're initializing a static variable, that's probably not done in
executable code.

The difference may be that the compiler can generate the appropriate
machine code to calculate the address of fff, but can't generate the right
object-file indications to the linker and run-time loader to get *them* to
do it - and if the variable being initialized is const, that might not work
as it might be mapped read-only.
____________________________________________________________
_______________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=
unsubscribe




-- 
Graham Bloice
Software Developer
Trihedral UK Limited
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: