Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Checking for Qt in a dissector
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 11:24:36 -0700
On Jul 3, 2017, at 10:22 AM, Paul Offord <Paul.Offord () advance7 com> wrote:
That won't work in this case. It's actually a plugin rather than a true dissector - I didn't describe it well.
"Plugin" and "true dissector" aren't opposite. Did you mean "post-dissector" rather than "plugin", as in "it's a plugin post-dissector"?
It uses Qt code so it definitely will only work with Wireshark 2.x.x.
Perhaps we need to have separate directories for plugins that contain GUI code and plugins that don't. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Checking for Qt in a dissector Paul Offord (Jul 03)
- Re: Checking for Qt in a dissector Pascal Quantin (Jul 03)
- Re: Checking for Qt in a dissector Paul Offord (Jul 03)
- Re: Checking for Qt in a dissector Roland Knall (Jul 03)
- Re: Checking for Qt in a dissector Guy Harris (Jul 03)
- Re: Checking for Qt in a dissector Paul Offord (Jul 03)
- Re: Checking for Qt in a dissector Roland Knall (Jul 04)
- Re: Checking for Qt in a dissector Paul Offord (Jul 03)
- Re: Checking for Qt in a dissector Pascal Quantin (Jul 03)