Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: wireshark analysis for packet loss
From: samira afzal <afzal.samira () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:48:41 -0200
Thanks for your reply and information On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Hugo van der Kooij < hugo.van.der.kooij () qsight nl> wrote:
This message contains a digitally signed email which can be read by opening the attachment. Hugo van der Kooij network engineer QSight IT T : +31 15 888 0 345 F : +31 15 888 0 445 E : hugo.van.der.kooij () qsight nl I : http://www.qsight.nl Arnhem - Delft - Veldhoven ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Hugo van der Kooij <hugo.van.der.kooij () qsight nl> To: Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Cc: Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:55:44 +0000 Subject: RE: [Wireshark-users] wireshark analysis for packet loss If you only measure 1 endpoint there is no way to tell where the packets are lost. That is why doing measurement on 1 point only is …. insufficient for real troubleshooting. Unfiltered traffic on both nodes may show some extra ICMP traffic warning you of issues somewhere on your path. (MTU path discovery for example) Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards, Hugo *Van:* wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users- bounces () wireshark org] *Namens *samira afzal *Verzonden:* Tuesday, 7 February, 2017 06:35 *Aan:* wireshark-users () wireshark org *Onderwerp:* [Wireshark-users] wireshark analysis for packet loss down votefavorite <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/42060182/wireshark-analysis-for-packet-loss> HI Everyone, I have a network like bellow. I captured pcap over node1 interface. I was checking pcap's statistics. My question is that when i get "tcp.analysis.lost_segment" , Does it mean these packets are lost through node0 to node1 (path1 +path2) or these lost packets happened over path2? path1 path2 .................Router............... . . . . node 0 node1 I sent this question in http://stackoverflow.com/ questions/42060182/wireshark-analysis-for-packet-loss but i have not received any reply there. I hope your guide. Thanks in advance ____________________________________________________________ _______________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject= unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- wireshark analysis for packet loss samira afzal (Feb 06)
- Re: wireshark analysis for packet loss Jaap Keuter (Feb 06)
- Re: wireshark analysis for packet loss Hugo van der Kooij (Feb 07)
- Message not available
- Re: wireshark analysis for packet loss samira afzal (Feb 08)