Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: DBAR revisited
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:12:29 -0800
On 2/15/17 12:00 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi all, Yet again we are confronted by Dell Backup And Restore, through https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13414 I can imagine Gerald (and users) getting sick and tired of marking duplicate bugs, in https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12036 Does this warrant to reconsider the proposal by Gerald for a warning, as in https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/16861/
I updated the change to check for DBAR 1.8, which should make it sufficiently well-behaved. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- DBAR revisited Jaap Keuter (Feb 15)
- Re: DBAR revisited Gerald Combs (Feb 15)