Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Conditional compiles


From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:30:36 +0100

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
wrote:

I remember getting (infrequent) questions/requests for building Wireshark
without the ability to capture.  Usually the desire seems to come from
corporate IT policies which don't want people capturing corporate traffic
but which need to support users' ability to analyze captures made elsewhere
(test systems or maybe from customers?).

[Of course most of these requests are probably for the Windows version
where you can control the ability to capture by not installing WinPCAP.]


Well... this is a capability issue. I don't think you can prevent your
users to capture by giving them a incomplete version of a software. If they
have the capability of capture, (aka they are root/admin) they can still
capture with a binary copy of the software. If they can't install software
or don't have the proper capability... they are done. I think that mixing
features of a software and capabilities is a bit messy... but maybe there
are specific scenarios I can't understand.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: