Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Fw: Re: How to find the bottleneck?


From: Pedro Tumusok <pedro.tumusok () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:06:57 +0200

Hi,

I will plug Jaspers blog post, before he gets to do it himself.

https://blog.packet-foo.com/2014/09/how-millisecond-delays-may-kill-database-performance/

Pedro

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Dennis Schneck <dennisschneck () web de>
wrote:


Hello Anne, Hello Hugo,
I tryed to get some statistics ( smb2, RTT, data usage ).


*Gesendet:* Montag, 28. August 2017 um 17:35 Uhr
*Von:* "Anne Blankert" <anne.blankert () geodan nl>
*An:* "Community support list for Wireshark" <
wireshark-users () wireshark org>
*Betreff:* Re: [Wireshark-users] How to find the bottleneck?
* Are you sure the branch has a 1 GB/s connection to HQ? 1GB/s possible,
but quite good for current standards.
* The network is as slow as the slowest link. Are you sure that the
slowest link between the branch client and HQ server is 1GB/sec? If traffic
is routed over public internet between branch and HQ, there are likely some
bottlenecks beyond your control
* Is there network latency between branch and headquarters? Even on high
bandwidth connections, network latency can cause low data transfer rates
because some protocols are very chatty: the next packet is sent only after
receiving acknowledgment for the previous packet. With high latency
networks, this may result in sometimes very poor transfer speeds



2017-08-28 14:37 GMT+02:00 Dennis Schneck <dennisschneck () web de>:


Hello,
the following scenario

headquarter:  Server (AIX) and client (Windows)
branch: client (Windows)


If the Clients from the branch open a project from the server in the
headquarter
it takes about 5 times longer than the same project open in headquarters.
The bandwith from the branch is 1 GB/s for the hole company.
So OK it takes longer in the branch but 5 times.
The Data is on the Storage System.

How to find the bottleneck in the network ?
The networkadmin is sure all is fine.

made a IO Graph from "tcp.seq" from one of some sample Data I got from
the Users

SPW = BAD = branch
SPG = GOOD = headquarter

Thanks
Dennis




____________________________________________________________
_______________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=
unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list Archives:
https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe:
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:
wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

____________________________________________________________
_______________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=
unsubscribe




-- 
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: