Re: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 135, Issue 2

[Barry Constantine via Wireshark-users <wireshark-users () wireshark org>]

unsubscribe

-----Original Message-----
From: Wireshark-users [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of wireshark-users-request () 
wireshark org
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 8:00 AM
To: wireshark-users () wireshark org
Subject: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 135, Issue 2

Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to
        wireshark-users () wireshark org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        wireshark-users-request () wireshark org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        wireshark-users-owner () wireshark org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Unsubscribe (Michael Ferrara)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 14:44:52 -0700
From: Michael Ferrara <mferrara1 () gmail com>
To: wireshark-users () wireshark org
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Unsubscribe
Message-ID:
        <CANB4v15mZhWp90YQsFyffymgvku2CY_D5L6DmRT7CJB3+83jSA () mail gmail com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Aug 4, 2017 7:25 AM, "Jacobo Pantoja" <jacobopantoja () gmail com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to capture network traffic between a wireless bridge made 
> with two OpenWRT devices, which means they use 4 address atheros stuff 
> for wireless bridge. For testing, beside the "client" AP, a non-wds 
> client joined to the "master" AP.
>
> The AP is using WPA2-PSK, and I can sucessfully see decrypted traffic 
> for non-wds clients, i.e. frames with both wlan.fc.ds set to 01 and to 
> 10. But traffic from the "client" AP to the "master" AP (i.e. frames 
> with wlan.fc.ds == 11) are not decrypted.
>
> I guess that the PSK should be the same for the non-wds clients than 
> for the wds client, but perhaps I'm wrong. All the EAPOL messages are 
> properly captured. Also, I don't know if the 4address Linux stuff is 
> adding something non-standard that WireShark cannot deal with at this moment.
>
> Any ideas?
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>              mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=
> unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20170806/a567ff30/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users () wireshark org
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


------------------------------

End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 135, Issue 2
***********************************************


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe