Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: buildbot down?


From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:03:30 +0100

For reference, the PowerShell equivalent, note that this will only attempt
to stop a pid once, there may be multiple locking handles for a single pid:

# Stop-ProcessByFileLock
# Stops processes that have an open handle on the path fragment specified

param(
  [parameter(Mandatory=$true)]
  [string]$path
)

$processes = @{}
$handles = handle $path
foreach($line in $handles) {
  if ($line -match "(\S+)\s+pid: (\d*)") {
    $processes[$($Matches[1])] = $($Matches[2])
  }
}

foreach($process in $processes.GetEnumerator()) {
    Write-Host "Killing process $($process.Name) with pid:$($process.Value)"
    Stop-Process -Id $process.Value -Force
}




On 10 April 2017 at 21:36, Maynard, Chris <Christopher.Maynard () igt com>
wrote:

Here's a batch file that *might* also help?  It makes use of both
handle.exe and taskkill.exe to *hopefully* achieve what you're looking
for?

:: Forcefully kills the process with the given open file containing the
:: specified pattern.  For example, running the following will kill the
first
:: process found with a file open that contains the string
"wireshark_pcapng"
:: anywhere in the name:
::
::     killprocbyfile.bat wireshark_pcapng
::

@ECHO OFF

IF ["%~1"] == [""] GOTO USAGE

@ECHO OFF
FOR /F "TOKENS=1-3 USEBACKQ" %%I IN (`HANDLE.EXE "%1"`) DO (
    IF "%%J" == "pid:" (
        ECHO Killing %%I PID: %%K
        TASKKILL.EXE /F /PID %%K
        GOTO :EOF
    )
)
GOTO :EOF

:USAGE
ECHO Usage: %~0 ^<pattern^>

- Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Maynard, Chris
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 2:12 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?

Would taskkill.exe help?

For example, "taskkill.exe /im dumpcap.exe" , etc.

I've also used WMIC in the past to save ProcessID's of tasks so you can
later kill
specific instances of a task instead of all of them with the same name.
I'd refer
you to the dumpcap.bat file posted on https://wiki.wireshark.org/Tools
for how
I did that.

- Chris
[1]:
https://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddoc
<https://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/taskkill.mspx?mfr=true>
s/en-us/taskkill.mspx?mfr=true

- Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Gerald Combs
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 2:06 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?

On 4/9/17 1:23 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:


On 9 April 2017 at 01:54, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org
<mailto:gerald () wireshark org <gerald () wireshark org>>> wrote:

    On 4/8/17 10:47 AM, Peter Wu wrote:
    >
    > There is another problem though with the Petri-Dish builder, a
previous
    > build on the Petri-Dish Windows x86 builder failed and left a
process on
    > the machine, breaking all following builds. Gerald, can you
have a look?

    It's back up.

    > Maybe it is an idea to add a pass that kills all
    > dumpcap/tshark/wireshark processes before starting the build?
(Assuming
    > that no other builds happen in parallel).

    Is there a straightforward equivalent to "kill -9 $( lsof -t
    /path/to/buildbot )" on Windows?


Difficult to identify which process you want to kill with
Stop-Process.  With PS 4.0 and later you can run ((Get-Process
-IncludeUserName).where({$_.username -AND $_.username -notmatch
"^NT"})) to get the processes owned by the user account running the
command, but there's still too many in there that shouldn't be
stopped.

Maybe Get-Process | Where-Object -Property ProcessName -match
".*(Process1|Process2|Process3).*" | Stop-Process would do if the
number of processes to look for isn't too bad.

How difficult would it be to parse the output of the Sysinternals
"Handle" utility in PS? That would presumably tell us which process
has the build directory locked while limiting the risk of clobbering
any other Buildbot instances that happen to be running.

________________________________________________________________
___________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev

mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
<wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International
Game
Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain proprietary,
confidential or trade secret information.  This message is intended
solely for
the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient and have
received this message in error, please delete this message from your
system.
Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this
message or
its attachments is strictly prohibited.

________________________________________________________________
___________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=
unsubscribe <wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe>


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International Game
Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain proprietary,
confidential or trade secret information.  This message is intended solely
for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient and
have received this message in error, please delete this message from your
system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of
this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.

____________________________________________________________
_______________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=
unsubscribe




-- 
Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: