Re: Regression in sccp fragments handling

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Apr 23, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Ivan Nardi <nardi.ivan () gmail com> wrote:

> I may have found a regression in sccp DT1 fragments handling in the
> latest 2.2.6 version; everything is fine on 2.2.5 (version details
> reported below).
> Using the attached pcap, fragments in pkts 3 and 4 are not correctly
> reassembled as a ranap id-RelocationResourceAllocation message anymore
> Am I doing something wrong?
> Let me know if you need further information
> Best Regards
> Ivan
>
> PS: it's my first report: should I have filled a bug in bugzilla, instead?

That's probably the best place, as it puts the problem in a repository where it can be kept track of more easily (so 
that if it gets "forgotten", at least it shows up when you search for open bugs, rather than being an e-mail amongst 
many others), allows fixes to be connected with the bug, and makes it easier to report "we fixed XXX in 2.2.7".

But thanks for the report in any case.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe