Re: Freeing a GTree in a struct creted with wmem_new0

[ss ws <sswsdev () gmail com>]

Actually I was not aware of wmem_tree.
looking at the .h file seems like this would fit my needs.

Thank you!

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Le 22 avr. 2017 13:49, "ss ws" <sswsdev () gmail com> a écrit :
>
> Hey there
> I want to add a GTree field to the 'umts_fp_conversation_info_t' struct
> and want to make sure I'm not creating a memory leak.
>
> This struct is currently created using *wmem_new0* with the *wmem_file_scope
> *allocator.
> I understand that creating and freeing GTrees should be done
> using g_tree_new_full and g_tree_destroy respectivly
>
> Since the struct is freed automatically when the file is closed, I don't
> really know where to place the g_tree_destory call. What should I do?
>
>
> Why not use a wmem_tree? Is there any feature from GTree you need that is
> not provided by wmem?
>
> Best regards,
> Pascal.
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=
> unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe