small vs large patch sets ?

[Bertin Nicolas <nicolas.bertin () al-enterprise com>]

Hi,


I'm updating 2 dissectors (packet-noe and packet-ua3g). So far, I've submitted

changes one by one (small patches). I believe it's the preferred solution for

reviewers instead of a large patch with everything in it.


Can you confirm?


Until now, I've wait for a patch to be merged before submitting the next one. My

workflow is probably wrong...


Is there a better way of doing thing?

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe