Wireshark mailing list archives

Enable extcap by default or not


From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 07:42:33 +0200

Hello List

There is currently a discussion going on in
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/17498 in regard to enabling extcap
features by default or not.

There are basically two sides to the argument:

Cons - extcap interfaces are advanced features, which will not be used by a
majority of users. As more and more of those interfaces emerge, it clutters
up the list. Therefore disabling them by default and enabling them when
needed is ok.

Pros - There are users out there, who use Wireshark solely together with
extcap interfaces. Lots of those users are not very familiar with Wireshark
in general. extcap was intended to bring capture device support to
Wireshark where otherwise it would not be present or very complicated to do
so. For those users to enable the support before using it seems like an
unnecessary hassle.

I just wanted to get the meaning of the list, on how we should proceed
here, and if three are other arguments for or against enabling extcap by
default.

To clarify, I am a Pro guy as I fear 3rd party users will not understand
this and this will lead to support cases which will generate the opinion
"Wireshark is overly complicated, let's use something else".

regards
Roland
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: