Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark ready for industrial usage
From: Thomas Wiens <th.wiens () gmx de>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:35 +0200
Hi, thanks to all to the effort in this part, this is really helpful. I've done a quick test with two Siemens CPUs, and it looks good. What also would be useful in the industrial automation field, is a statistics overview. Some time ago I've started a project in python, which calls tshark to extract some Profinet fields of a capture file, and calculates some statistic data, like min/max/mean jitter values and the number of lost frames and errors. Because the old versions hadn't this GSD-file feature, I've estimated the projected update rate by ARsetup telegrams (if there are some), or if there is none, by the cycle-counter differences. But the Profinet dissector is still a plugin, I don't know if it's possible to write a tap (which I think is needed) for a dissector which comes as a plugin. Is there any reason why it's still a plugin? -- Thomas Wiens ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark ready for industrial usage Tobias Scholz (May 26)
- Re: Wireshark ready for industrial usage Thomas Wiens (May 26)
- Re: Wireshark ready for industrial usage Guy Harris (May 26)
- Re: Wireshark ready for industrial usage Thomas Wiens (May 26)