Re: Packet sample repository/library?

[Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>]

On 20 December 2016 at 08:21, Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Jirka Novak <j.novak () netsystem cz> wrote:
>
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> >   first: happy-shark is very good idea. All notes above I would like to
> > discuss and then I will try to add my samples with respect to
> > conclusions...
> >
> > > For a basic testing framework, have a look at
> > > https://github.com/wireshark/happy-shark
> > >
> > > To-do: populate the test/ directory with lots of specific samples :-)
> >
> > This approach looks good to me, I will try to add samples.
> > What I'm missing there is idea how to add description for a sample - I
> > mean "description" - why sample is there and "specification" - what
> > wireshark should do with it.
> > Testing with PDML is good idea, but it tests dissectors only. Time to
> > time you want to store sample because GUI should do something with it
> > (e.g. show it in red).
> > 1) Won't be good idea to ask for e.g. <sample>.description.txt and
> > <sample>.specification.txt for each sample?
> > 2) Won't be good idea to allow skip a sample from automatic testing
> > (because it is for GUI demonstration)?
> For GUI stuff, a idea will be to use Extensive Testing (
> http://www.extensivetesting.org/ )
> it is on my TODO list but never found time to implement...

With a Windows view on things I've been thinking about Appium:
http://appium.io/

-- 
Graham Bloice

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe