Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Back-port new protocol (OpenDOF) to 2.0 branch?
From: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:22:03 +0200
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Mike Morrin <morrinmike () gmail com> wrote:
The OpenDOF dissector has just been merged to Head, (thank you to all reviewers). We are keen to get it into a released version of Wireshark. I don't see a scheduled release date for 2.2, so presume that it is not soon. If I back-port the change to the 2.0 branch, what are the chances of it being accepted?
Hi Mike, Sorry, there is no backport of "new" dissector to stable branch. We need to waiting the next release (2.2) Cheers
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Back-port new protocol (OpenDOF) to 2.0 branch? Mike Morrin (Apr 14)
- Re: Back-port new protocol (OpenDOF) to 2.0 branch? Alexis La Goutte (Apr 14)
- Re: Back-port new protocol (OpenDOF) to 2.0 branch? Pascal Quantin (Apr 14)
- Re: Back-port new protocol (OpenDOF) to 2.0 branch? Michael Mann (Apr 14)
- Re: Back-port new protocol (OpenDOF) to 2.0 branch? Michael Mann (Apr 14)
- Re: Back-port new protocol (OpenDOF) to 2.0 branch? Alexis La Goutte (Apr 14)