Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: wtap.h / struct ieee802_11n & ac presence_flags


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:03:09 -0700


On Sep 24, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Simon Barber <simon.barber () meraki net> wrote:

Is there any reason that the presence_flags in these structs are done as a single flags field, requiring separate 
#defines to define the individual flags, rather than individual single bit members of the struct?

(Presumably the single-bit members would all be at the beginning of the structure, so that they get packed into a 
single word.)

The reason I went that way was to let all the bits be cleared with a single assignment.  I suppose we could memset the 
entire union.

(BTW, it's not as if the only ones are for 11n and 11ac; each PHY that has additional information to provide has a 
member of the union.)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: