Re: Moving codecs to libwireshark or libwsutil?

[Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>]

Le 30 nov. 2015 8:01 PM, "Guy Harris" <guy () alum mit edu> a écrit :
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 6:40 AM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
wrote:
> > Should we move codecs functions to one of the existing libraries? Or
add it to its own?
> They already *are* in their own library, but it's a static library, not a
dynamic library; perhaps we should just make libcodec a dynamic library,
and export functions from it with WS_DLL_PUBLIC.
>

Yes I should have been clearer in my initial description.
My suggestion with an extra parameter giving the hash table address is also
working fine, so I do not have a strong feeling either way (the changed
parameter is faster to do but might not be the best long term solution).
If possible I would like to have this fixed for Wireshark 2.0.1 but I
wonder if such change is compatible with our usual policy to keep APIs
constant (does it apply when they are buggy?).

Pascal.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe