Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: proto.h extension
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:29:22 -0700
On May 7, 2015, at 8:13 AM, "John Dill" <John.Dill () greenfieldeng com> wrote:
I have a couple of extensions that I created for the Wireshark baseline that we're using (1.10.x). The diffs to proto.h and proto.c show the code changes to add a couple of features that I've found useful, unit strings and hiding the bits for bitmask header fields. http://codepad.org/KTGdEL1t
You need more than /* Following constants have to be ORed with a base_display_e when dissector * want to control aspects of the display string for a header_field_info */ as a comment there - you need comments explaining what each of those flags actually *does*. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- proto.h extension John Dill (May 07)
- Re: proto.h extension Christopher Maynard (May 07)
- Re: proto.h extension Guy Harris (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: proto.h extension John Dill (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension John Dill (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension Guy Harris (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension Evan Huus (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension Guy Harris (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension Jeff Morriss (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension Alexis La Goutte (May 10)
- Re: proto.h extension Guy Harris (May 08)