Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: MPLS dissection fail
From: Francesco Fondelli <francesco.fondelli () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:51:07 +0200
I think we should revert to the original behavior as suggested in the bug report. WS being able to automatically dissect the majority of MPLS encapsulated traffic with the first nibble set to 0 is a feature we should preserve. thank you ciao fra On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Jasper Bongertz <jasper () packet-foo com> wrote:
Hi all, I just added a bug report, as agreed with Alexis, regarding the dissection failure in 1.99 when a frame contains MPLS shims. This is the bug report URL: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 and I also attached a screen shot comparing 1.12.5 and 1.99 to this email (I hope it doesn't get stripped off by the list) Cheers, Jasper ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- MPLS dissection fail Jasper Bongertz (Jun 12)
- Re: MPLS dissection fail Francesco Fondelli (Jun 13)
- Re: MPLS dissection fail Pascal Quantin (Jun 13)
- Re: MPLS dissection fail Francesco Fondelli (Jun 13)