Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors" function.


From: Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:21:45 +0000



From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Dario Lombardo
Sent: den 13 februari 2015 10:18
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors" function.



On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Anders Broman <a.broman58 () gmail com<mailto:a.broman58 () gmail com>> wrote:

First thought is, unnecessary processing to satisfy this new functionality, which frankly I have my doubts about...
I have the same feeling. But I can't figure out something else so far.

Just leave it be then? My main concern was to turn it off and that works after a rebuild so for me it’s ok.
Regards
Anders

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: