Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: wiretap - using as a library rather than coupled with Wireshark?


From: Tim Furlong <dev.null.2007 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:29:27 -0500

Hi Richard,

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you - and I wish I had more time to
look into it before responding, but the baby will be up soon and I wanted
to follow up while I had a few minutes.

Also, quick but important caveat: I'm a dev-list lurker, as opposed to a
core Wireshark developer, and my opinions are entirely my own - I'll
happily to defer to them on any of the below.  But, since I opened my big
keyboard about editcap in the first place, I'll do what I can. :-)

One of the biggest challenges you'll face in this is that the code to parse
radiotap is in epan/dissectors and gets compiled into libwireshark; you
won't want to pull libwireshark in to editcap (it'd kind of defeat the
purpose of editcap).  Didn't locate the airopeek code, but believe it's in
libwiretap, which should be fine.  Also, I don't know if there's code to
generate radiotap headers, though I'd be inclined to follow through what
wireshark does when doing a wi-fi capture to try and find it (well, doing
the capture first to confirm that it.

Actually, come to think of it, if you can do wi-fi capture with dumpcap,
then there is probably code somewhere to write radiotap without going to
libwireshark, so you might be in luck - though you'd want to confirm with a
test capture that dumpcap does write radiotap headers before you sink much
time into that.  For translating from airopeek, though, as Guy indicated,
you're likely going to do the heavy lifting on that yourself.  My
inclination would be to do concurrent Wireshark and Airopeek captures on
the same network at the same time, if possible, and then use the two
captures to figure out your field mappings - or at least, to start doing so.

Sorry I can't be of more help, but hopefully there's something useful in
the above. :P

Thanks, and good luck,
-Tim





On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Richard Kinder <rkinder () quantenna com>
wrote:

Hi Guy, Tim,

Thanks for this input. I think modification of editpcap is the best path
forward for this problem.

The files I'm looking at converting are indeed Airopeek, so I'll need to
add support for translation of the peek* metadata to radiotap. Any pointers
as to where to start, architectural overviews of libwiretap or
documentation are greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Harris [mailto:guy () alum mit edu]
Sent: Saturday, 28 November 2015 4:54 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Cc: Richard Kinder <rkinder () quantenna com>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] wiretap - using as a library rather than
coupled with Wireshark?


On Nov 27, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Tim Furlong <dev.null.2007 () gmail com> wrote:

Sorry if I'm just missing something, but would editcap itself do the job?

editcap <in.pkt> <out.pcapng>

should read your Wildpackets file and produce a pcapng file; add a "-F
pcap" for pcap format instead.

...as long as it's not an AiroPeek capture or an OmniPeek Wi-Fi capture,
as *that* would require translating the radio metadata headers from either
of the *Peek formats to a format supported in pcap/pcapng files, such as
radiotap.  editcap doesn't look at the packet contents, and can't do that
translation.


This email, including its contents and any attachment(s), may contain
confidential information of Quantenna Communications, Inc. and is solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you may have received this in error,
please contact the sender and permanently delete this email, its contents
and any attachment(s).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe




-- 
Tim Furlong
tim.furlong () gmail com
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: