Re: Npcap 0.04 call for test

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Aug 24, 2015, at 1:32 AM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com> wrote:

> 2015-08-24 10:28 GMT+02:00 Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>:
>
> > Note that, if all packets are IPv4 or IPv6 packets, you could also use NdisMediumIP, if that means "received and 
> > transmitted packets begin with an IP header and have no link-layer header", and map that to DLT_RAW.
>
> Correct, but I was finding the NdisMediumLoopback type maybe more representative as there can be other interfaces 
> using raw IP (liek MBIM USB class). At least with such DLT we have no doubt regarding the fact that it is a loopback 
> capture :)

Using the LINKTYPE_/DLT_ value to determine *anything* other than the format of the data at the beginning of the packet 
is an error.  In particular, using it to determine the interface type is an error.

You might, for example, have:

        LINKTYPE_ETHERNET/DLT_EN10MB as the link-layer header type for packets captured from an 802.11 interface that's 
not in monitor mode (and, yes, the data at the beginning of the packet will be an Ethernet header);

        LINKTYPE_ETHERNET/DLT_EN10MB as the link-layer header type for packets captured from a loopback device on Linux 
(and, yes, the data at the beginning of the packet will be an Ethernet header);

        LINKTYPE_NULL/DLT_NULL as the link-layer header type for packets captured from a loopback device on a 
BSD-flavord-but-not-OpenBSD system;

        LINKTYPE_LOOP/DLT_LOOP as the link-layer header type for packets captured from a loopback device on OpenBSD;

        LINKTYPE_IPNET/DLT_IPNET as the link-layer header type for packets captured from a loopback device on Solaris;

etc..

If you want to know whether a device is a loopback device, check the PCAP_IF_LOOPBACK flag in the flags member of the 
pcap_if_t structure supplied for the device in a pcap_findalldevs() or pcap_findalldevs_ex() call.

And, yes, if Npcap isn't setting that flag for the loopback device, it must be changed to do so.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe