Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: BItfields Larger than 32 Bits


From: Kevin Cox <kevincox () kevincox ca>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:08:28 -0400

On 13/05/14 15:06, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
The better will be add 64bits bitfields... ;-)


Unless I am missing something a 64 bit bitfield can't be used because
the bitmask field of header_field_info is only 32 bits wide.

Cheers,
Kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: