Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Profiled dumpcap
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 13:29:00 -0700
On May 8, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net> wrote:
It might be worth it to reduce the number of write_to_file() by putting stuff in a buffer before writing to file.
write_to_file() calls fwrite(), which puts stuff in a buffer before writing to the file in the sense of "calling write() or WriteFile()). Would adding another layer of buffering atop the standard I/O library buffering make a significant difference here? (libpcap, as used by, for example, tcpdump, makes multiple fwrite() calls per packet written.) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Evan Huus (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Evan Huus (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Evan Huus (May 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Richard Brodie (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Guy Harris (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 09)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Guy Harris (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)