Re: Stateless Dissection

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
wrote:

> Hi Evan,
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 05:07:19PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
> > The implementation is a bit of a hack in that stateless dissection still
> > does all the stateful work, it just throws it away after each packet (so
> > stateless is actually slightly slower than stateful) but it seems to work
> > in my simple tests.
> >
> > Does this seem useful to people? Ideas for a better flag (Z just happened
> > to be handy)? Other thoughts, comments, suggestions?
>
> Great, but I'd like to see also something working for *given* frame number,
> this would also fix issues with -R (like remove all conversations,
> reassemblies created by *given* frame number).

I don't think I understand?


> About flag, I'd suggest -0 (zero-pass) ;-)

I quite like that actually :)

Cheers,
> Jakub
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe