Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Q: tshark memory usage
From: Kenichi Okuyama <kenichi.okuyama () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:14:25 +0900
Hi Kurt, This might not be of help to you, but just in case. I did had similar issue while I was running wireshark/tshark on both 32bit Linux, 32bit Windows XP machine. However, after I moved to both 64bit Linux, 64bit Windows7, I have not faced this issue anymore. It is ture that I do have many more memory and swap area size after I moved to 64bit environment. But I don't believe moving from 3Gbyte environment to 4Gbyte environment would make huge difference. Except for one thing. Available "ADDRESS SPACE SIZE". I did not follow all the messages you've wrote, but from above facts, I'm assuming that wireshark/tshark requires LARGE ADDRESS SPACES. and you're running out of "contiguous memory address space" rather than "memory" itself. # If the memory usage is being fragmented, and yet allocator requires for long contiguous # memory chunk inside, you will run out of address space while having enough memory. Maybe sharing the information about your environment, especially about 32bit/64bit environment, would be of help to identify why @hoangsonk49 could run tshark for 6month while you can't. Sorry in case this was not right. -- Kenichi Okuyama ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Q: tshark memory usage Kurt Knochner (Jun 22)
- Re: Q: tshark memory usage Kenichi Okuyama (Jun 22)