Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: const'ness of value_string_ext
From: Kevin Cox <kevincox () kevincox ca>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:54:01 -0400
On 24/07/14 16:38, Evan Huus wrote:
We are usually not afraid of breaking API changes (whether that's a good thing or not is debatable, but it's true) so probably solution 2 if somebody wants to tackle it :)
I others agree I will start by just changing the extended value string functions as a start. Then we can move out from there.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- const'ness of value_string_ext Kevin Cox (Jul 24)
- Re: const'ness of value_string_ext Evan Huus (Jul 24)
- Re: const'ness of value_string_ext Kevin Cox (Jul 24)
- Re: const'ness of value_string_ext darkjames-ws (Jul 25)
- Re: const'ness of value_string_ext Kevin Cox (Jul 25)
- Re: const'ness of value_string_ext Evan Huus (Jul 24)