Wireshark mailing list archives
Should dissect_tcp_pdus be used as much as possible?
From: Peter Wu <peter () lekensteyn nl>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 10:36:33 +0200
Hi, Should reassembly be enabled in as many TCP protocols as possible? That is, is it desirable that TCP-based protocols use dissect_tcp_pdus with reassembly set to true? I am asking because I was fixing an error in the return value of the Plan 9 dissector[1]. While at it, I converted it to use dissect_tcp_pdus as that was trivial. I have not seen a fragmented 9p capture though. Kind regards, Peter https://lekensteyn.nl [1]: https://code.wireshark.org/review/2836/ ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Should dissect_tcp_pdus be used as much as possible? Peter Wu (Jul 04)
- Re: Should dissect_tcp_pdus be used as much as possible? mmann78 (Jul 04)
- Re: Should dissect_tcp_pdus be used as much as possible? Guy Harris (Jul 04)
- Re: Should dissect_tcp_pdus be used as much as possible? mmann78 (Jul 04)