Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Expert item for TCP RST flag
From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin.groothuis () riverbed com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 20:11:56 +1100
On 8/01/14 12:09 , Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/7/14 4:19 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:Right now TCP packets with RST are marked as severity chat. Is there a reason why this isn't warn?Some applications use RSTs as a way to quickly close connections. Internet Explorer is probably the most common example.
A host will also send a RST when it gets more data after it has send a FIN. (But this might be the specific TCP stack I have seen this behaviour on) TCP RST is not something I'm worried about. Edwin ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Expert item for TCP RST flag Joerg Mayer (Jan 07)
- Re: Expert item for TCP RST flag Gerald Combs (Jan 08)
- Re: Expert item for TCP RST flag mmann78 (Jan 08)
- Re: Expert item for TCP RST flag Edwin Groothuis (Jan 09)
- Re: Expert item for TCP RST flag Joerg Mayer (Jan 09)
- Re: Expert item for TCP RST flag Joerg Mayer (Jan 09)
- Re: Expert item for TCP RST flag Jeff Morriss (Jan 09)
- Re: Expert item for TCP RST flag Michael Tuexen (Jan 09)
- Re: Expert item for TCP RST flag Gerald Combs (Jan 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Expert item for TCP RST flag Ed Beroset (Jan 09)