Re: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9607] TFShark (Terminal FileShark)

[Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>]

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:20:09PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon () wireshark org wrote:
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9607
>
> Michael Mann <mmann78 () netscape net> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 URL|                            |http://www.wireshark.org/li
>                    |                            |sts/wireshark-dev/201306/ms
>                    |                            |g00101.html
>
> --- Comment #1 from Michael Mann <mmann78 () netscape net> ---
> Mailing list comments on the subject of FileShark for reference:
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201306/msg00101.html (start of
> thread, also shown in URL field above.  Using this as my main source of
> direction)
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201306/msg00102.html
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201306/msg00104.html
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201307/msg00002.html (looks like
> we need a new name...)

No, I don't think so. They are the copycats, not us. Our product is still
called Wireshark and if we install a binary that is called fileshark then
there should not be a problem about it.

Ciao
     Jörg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe