Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: tshark: Difference between -R and -Y


From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:30:45 -0500

On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 07:30:04PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
Live capture with two-pass dissection is effectively undefined
behaviour at this point (I'm surprised you're seeing any packets at
all to be honest).

Ah, OK. As some "invalid" cases (-R without -2) are rejected I expected
that this was a valid combination.

Whoops. I added an explicit error message in r54643.

Evan

Everything should work as expected when reading from a capture file.

It does.

Thanks!
    Jörg

On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> wrote:
I just found out that I don't understand what -R does.

If I run
tshark -2 -R "udp.port==53" -i wlan0
then it seems that I see all packets (arp, dns, lldp, ...)
if I instead run
tshark -2 -Y "udp.port==53" -i wlan0
I only see dns.
The manpage is not helpful either to explain what I am seeing
(snv HEAD / r54612)

Can someone please explain what is going on here?

--
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: