Re: -commits emails

[mmann78 () netscape net]

The reason I put "list" in quotes was because I wasn't sure of the form.  I've never followed -bugs, but I do 
frequently skim the archive.  And I understand why others follow or skim -commits. I was okay with the interface 
TortoiseSVN provided me when grabbing the latest code if I wanted to further investigate changes I saw (TortoiseGit 
hasn't been as good, but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt for now that I'm just using it incorrectly)
 
But it appears now I have to skim the -bugs archive and "something else" in Gerrit (because I don't really want it all 
emailed to me) to get the same information that used to all come through -bugs?  Still trying to get a handle on that 
change to my "workflow".  I just feel like I'm working a lot harder to do the same level of "monitoring" of Wireshark 
than I was in the past.  So I figured I might be doing something wrong and should ask.


-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Sent: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 5:10 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] -commits emails


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:03 PM,  <mmann78 () netscape net> wrote:
> On a related note, it seems like Gerrit encourages more comments within its
> interface when discussing a bug/enhancement then doing it Bugzilla (where
> all outside patches used to go through).  It was (is) always nice to have a
> "masochist" (-bugs subscriber) interject something into a bug in Bugzilla
> they weren't necessarily "following".   Does Gerrit create the need for yet
> another "list" to follow to get the same information?

Individuals can choose to watch "all comments" for a project in their
personal gerrit preferences. There shouldn't be a need for an actual
mailing list.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
> To: alexis.lagoutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>; Developer support list for
> Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Sent: Mon, Feb 10, 2014 2:50 pm
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] -commits emails
>
> On 2/10/14 10:41 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
> >     And as of this morning (or perhaps slightly earlier) I've stopped
> >     receiving them at all...?
> >
> > Yes, i confirm too...
>
> They've been mis-sent since Thursday. (It might help if the script were
> running in production mode instead of test mode.) There are 21 missing
> commits. I'll fix the script and resend the messages shortly.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

 


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe