Wireshark mailing list archives

Unable to recognise DTLS packets


From: Tulika Bose <tulika.bose () tcs com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:32:01 +0530

Dear All,
   I have come across a problem with the display filter of dtls.The version I am using is 1.10.4.I have some DTLS 
packets,where DTLS is used over CoAP,and they have been captured in a .pcapng file. But when I filter the packets using 
the string 'dtls',no packets get displayed.On the other hand,when the filter string used is 'coap' or 'udp', packets 
get displayed,because DTLS is using the same port as coap which is 5683.But the problem is that the wireshark cannot 
recognise the DTLS header,it parses the same as the CoAP header,although these are actually dtls packets.It would be 
very kind of you,if you help  me with the issue.

Thanks & Regards
Tulika Bose
Follow me on KNOME: https://knome.ultimatix.net/u/tulika.bose
Tata Consultancy Services Limited
Cell:- +918820214176
Mailto: tulika.bose () tcs com
Website: http://www.tcs.com
____________________________________________
Experience certainty. IT Services
Business Solutions
Consulting
____________________________________________
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain 
confidential or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the 
information contained in this e-mail message 
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and 
immediately and permanently delete the message 
and any attachments. Thank you


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: