Re: error encountered during compilation on windows

[Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>]

nmake (like all other make systems ??) uses relative times to determine if
a rebuild is required, e.g. if the .c is newer than the .obj then compile
the .c.  The absolute time doesn't make any difference.


On 11 February 2014 12:15, Rahul Rohit <rahul.rohit () aricent com> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>
>
> <<So you haven't managed to build vanilla Wireshark without **any**
> modifications?>>
>
> Yes. I am using Wireshark baseline code  but I am unable to make the build
> . I am getting the errors that I mentioned in my last mail
>
>
>
>
>
> What I observed during the compilation is that at each compilation
> command(nmake -f Makefile.nmake all) all the files are getting compiled
> over and over again. I wonder if it has got something to do
>
> With the system time ?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Rahul Rohit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:
> wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] *On Behalf Of *Anders Broman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5:12 PM
>
> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] error encountered during compilation on
> windows
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [
> mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org<wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Rahul Rohit
> *Sent:* den 11 februari 2014 11:26
> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] error encountered during compilation on
> windows
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> <<< If this is the first time you have tried to build Wireshark, then the
> usual advice is to go back and read the Developers Guide again and make
> sure you are following the prescribed method exactly as written because it
> does work for many people.>>
>
>
>
> <No, this is not the first time, I often make builds.
>
>
>
> <<< If you have done that, or you have previously built Wireshark
> successfully, is your copy of the sources modified in any way?  If so can
> you compile an unmodified version without the changes? >>
>
>
>
> <In all the previous cases , after getting the error when I commented
>  'WS_MSVC_NORETURN'(in except.h) before 'except_throwd', 'except_throwf',
> 'except_rethrow', 'except_throwf' functions it worked.
>
>
>
>
>
> So you haven't managed to build vanilla Wireshark without **any**
> modifications?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Anders
>
>
>
>
>
> ===============================================================================
> Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
> for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> ?subject=unsubscribe



-- 
Graham Bloice
Software Developer
Trihedral UK Limited

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe