Re: Add-on Lua code for file system operations?

[Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan () oracle com>]

On Feb 8, 2014, at 8:36 PM, Tony Trinh <tony19 () gmail com> wrote:

> Hadrial Kaplan wrote:
>  
> The problem is if you write a plugin for others to use, requiring them to compile code is a high bar to expect.  So 
> if it's more than just another pure lua lib which doesn't need c-code to be compiled, as a file/dir accessor would 
> need, it's tough. :(
>
> I agree (?)... or perhaps I'm not following. ;)

Sorry I was using a phone to email. :)

I meant that if I write a Lua plugin for wireshark and want other normal users to be able to use my plugin, then 
expecting those users to compile C-code is a high barrier to entry.  Since file handling functions require C-code to be 
compiled, and can't be done in a pure Lua-library alone, it might make sense to have wireshark offer them... not all 
such functions, just a few more simple ones like mkdir/remove, and probably only them.


> I *think* Guy was proposing the Wireshark Lua API included the LuaFileSystem library (or a wrapper around it) out of 
> the box, which is something already done with Lua BitOp [1][2], so users wouldn't have to explicitly compile it 
> themselves. Or were you referring to something else?

Yeah, that kind of idea - although I would vote for his second option: not to use/wrap LuaFileSystem, and instead just 
expose the existing ws_mkdir/ws_remove functions.

-hadriel

p.s. Penlight uses LuaFileSystem for file/dir operations, I believe. It has a hard dependency on it for those modules, 
afaik.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe